From Chapter I., The Milesian School
Now it is not hard to see how meteorological considerations may have led Thales to adopt the view he
did. Of all the things we know, water seems to take the most various shapes. It is familiar to us in a
solid, a liquid, and a vaporous form, and so Thales may well have thought he saw the world-process
from water and back to water again going on before his eyes. The phenomenon of evaporation naturally
suggests that the fire of the heavenly bodies is kept up by the moisture they draw from the sea. Even at
the present day people speak of "the sun drawing water." Water comes down again in rain; and lastly,
so the early cosmologists thought, it turns to earth. This may have seemed natural enough to men
familiar with the river of Egypt which had formed the Delta, and the torrents of Asia Minor which bring
down large alluvial deposits. At the present day the Gulf of Latmos, on which Miletos used to stand, is
filled up. Lastly, they thought, earth turns once more to water—an idea derived from the observation of
dew, night-mists, and subterranean springs. For these last were not in early times supposed to have
anything to do with the rain. The "waters under the earth" were regarded as an independent source of
37. Met. A, 3. 983 b 22 ; Aet. i. 3, 1 ; Simpl. Phys. p. 36, 10 (R. P. 10, 12, 12 a). The last of Aristotle's explanations, that Thales was influenced by cosmogonical theories about Okeanos and Tethys, has strangely been supposed to be more historical than the rest, whereas it is merely a fancy of Plato's taken literally. Plato says (Theaet. 180 d 2; Crat. 402 b 4) that Herakleitos and his predecessors (οἱ ῥέοντες) derived their philosophy from Homer (Il. xiv. 201), and even earlier sources (Orph. frag. 2, Diels, Vors. 66 B 2). In quoting this suggestion, Aristotle refers it to "some"—a word which often means Plato—and he calls the originators of the theory παμπαλαίους, as Plato had done (Met. A, 3. 983 b 28; cf. Theaet. 181 b 3). This is how Aristotle gets history out of Plato. See Note on Sources, § 2.
38. Compare Arist. De an. A, 2. 405 b 2 (R. P. 220) with the passages referred to in the last note. We now know that, though Aristotle declines to consider Hippon as a philosopher (Met. A, 3. 984 a 3; R. P. 219 a), he was discussed in the Peripatetic history of medicine known as Menon's Iatrika. See §185.
39. The view here taken most resembles that of the "Homeric allegorist" Herakleitos (R. P. 12 a). That, however, is also a conjecture, probably of Stoic, as the others are of Peripatetic, origin.
Created for Peithô's Web from Early Greek Philosophy by John Burnet, 3rd edition (1920). London: A & C Black Ltd. Burnet's footnotes have been converted to chapter endnotes. Greek unicode text entered with Peithô's Younicoder.
Web design by Larry Clark and RSBoyes (Agathon). Peithô's Web gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Anthony Beavers in the creation of this web edition of Burnet. Please send comments to: