From Burnet's Introduction
VIII. Motion and Rest
A more important question is the nature of this motion. It is clear that it must have existed before the
beginning of the world, since it is what brought the world into being. It cannot, therefore, be identified
with the diurnal revolution of the heavens, as it has been by many writers, or with any other purely
The Pythagorean doctrine, as expounded in Plato's Timaeus,31 is that the original
motion was irregular and disorderly, and we shall see reason for believing that the Atomists ascribed a
motion of that kind to the atoms. It is safer, then, not to attribute any regular or well-defined motion to
the primary substance of the early cosmologists at this stage.32
29. This way of thinking is often called Hylozoism, but that is still more misleading. No doubt the early cosmologists said things about the world and the primary substance which, from our point of view, imply that they are alive; but that is a very different thing from ascribing a "plastic power" to "matter." The concept of "matter" did not yet exist and the underlying assumption is simply that everything, life included, can be explained mechanically, as we say, that is, by body in motion. Even that is not stated explicitly, but taken for granted.
30. It was Aristotle who first took the fateful step of identifying the "eternal motion" with the diurnal revolution of the heavens.
31. Plato, Tim. 30 a.
32. As I understand him, Prof. W. A. Heidel regards the "eternal motion" as a rotary or vortex motion (δίνη), on the ground that it is hazardous to assume that an early thinker, such as Anaximenes, "distinguished between the primordial motion of the infinite Air and the original motion in the cosmos" (see his article, " The δίνη in Anaximenes and Anaximander," Classical Philology, i. p. 279). It seems to me, on the other hand, that any one who held the world had come into being must have made such a distinction, especially if he also held the doctrine of innumerable worlds. As will be seen later, I adopt Prof. Heidel's view that the "original motion of the cosmos" was a rotary one in the earliest cosmological systems, but it was certainly not "eternal," and I do not think we can infer anything from it as to the pre-mundane motion, except that it must have been of such a nature that it could give rise to the δίνη.
Created for Peithô's Web from Early Greek Philosophy by John Burnet, 3rd edition (1920). London: A & C Black Ltd. Burnet's footnotes have been converted to chapter endnotes. Greek unicode text entered with Peithô's Younicoder.
Web design by Larry Clark and RSBoyes (Agathon). Peithô's Web gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Anthony Beavers in the creation of this web edition of Burnet. Please send comments to: